I've completed the initial version of the class files for the plug-in
dependecy system and the pluggable renderers and I am adding them to
OpenJUMP-Ex' code base. I want to keep the package names in OpenJUMP-Ex the
same as the package names in OpenJUMP. This will make transition of code
from OpenJUMP-Ex into OpenJUMP much easier.
Most of the pacakges in JUMP use a "com.vividsolutions" prefix. I created
two new packages for OpenJUMP's core using the same package names as JUMP,
except that I replaced the "com.vividsolutions" prefix with "org.openjump".
As an example, the two packages I want to eventually add to OpenJUMP's core
are:
org.openjump.workbench.ui.renderer
org.openjump.plugin
However, I noticed that existing packages that have been added to OpenJUMP
use the "org.openjump.core" prefix, essentially adding the "core" package.
Is this necessary? Would it be better to use only the "org.openjump" prefix
so that our code more closely resembles the package structure in JUMP?
If there is a good reason to stick with the "org.openjump.core" prefix I
will modify my package names.
Thanks,
The Sunburned Surveyor
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
