`julia-dev` has now moved to discourse.

One possibility would be to start forwarding posts for `julia-users` from
Google Groups to Discourse, but that is a one way street. So before I
enable that I would like to hear what everybody thinks about it.

On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 at 02:01 Tom Breloff <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1... can we move already?  Discourse is a huge improvement.  I
> specifically don't answer some questions here because of the difficulty in
> writing answers with code.
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> - Selectively subscribe to certain topics/categories of discussion and not
> others.
> - Selectively see threads that reach certain quality/interest thresholds.
> - Take links directly from where one reads messages
>     (I really dislike the Google groups interface, so I use Gmail for
> reading messages, but then getting a link to a post is a real pain; the
> Discourse interface is much better).
> - Real tools for moderation, management and administration.
> - Active, open development
>     Google Groups is not only proprietary, but it's also effectively
> abandonware.
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Simon Byrne <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Personally, I find the following an improvement over google groups:
> - code blocks (copying and pasting code into the google groups interface
> always tends to look bad)
> - the ability to edit posts
> - the ability to move threads to different categories (i.e. posts to
> julia-dev which should have gone to julia-users, etc)
>
>
> On Sunday, 6 November 2016 10:33:20 UTC, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
>
> Le dimanche 06 novembre 2016 à 01:49 -0800, Andreas Lobinger a écrit :
> > Hello colleague,
> >
> > > The Julia community has been growing rapidly over the last few
> > > years and discussions are happening at many different places: there
> > > are several Google Groups (julia-users, julia-dev, ...), IRC,
> > > Gitter, and a few other places. Sometimes packages or organisations
> > > also have their own forums and chat rooms.
> > >
> > > In the past, Discourse has been brought up as an alternative
> > > platform that we could use instead of Google Groups and that would
> > > allow us to invite the entire Julia community into one space.
> > >
> >
> > What problem with the julia-users mailing-list and the google groups
> > web interface is solved by using discourse?
> You can have a look at the previous thread about this:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-users/4oDqW-QxyVA/lw71uqNGBQAJ
>
> I also encourage you to give a try to Discourse (this can be done
> without even creating an account on their test instance).
>
> > Why do you think (can you prove?) more centralisation will happen
> > with discourse?
> Centralization will be made possible by allowing for sub-forums
> dedicated to each topic (stats, optimization, data...) inside Discourse
> itself, instead of creating totally separate mailing lists as is
> currently done. Of course people will still be free to use something
> else, but that's quite unlikely.
>
> > > We would like to solicit feedback from the broader Julia community
> > > about moving julia-users to Discourse as well, and potentially
> > > other mailing lists like julia-stats.
> > >
> >
> > Please define 'We'.
> "We" meant "Julia core developers".
>
> > > If you have feedback or comments, please post them
> > > at http://discourse.julialang.org/t/migration-of-google-groups-to-
> > > discourse or in this thread.
> > >
> >
> > In some parts of the world, asking for feedback on a topic via a
> > different medium is seen as unfriendly act ... but still there is
> > this thread.
> The idea was that we would like to see how well it works by having
> people use Discourse for this discussion. But as you noted there's this
> thread for people who don't want to to that.
>
>
> Regards
>
> > Wishing a happy day,
> >          Andreas
>
>
> On Sunday, 6 November 2016 10:33:20 UTC, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
>
> Le dimanche 06 novembre 2016 à 01:49 -0800, Andreas Lobinger a écrit :
> > Hello colleague,
> >
> > > The Julia community has been growing rapidly over the last few
> > > years and discussions are happening at many different places: there
> > > are several Google Groups (julia-users, julia-dev, ...), IRC,
> > > Gitter, and a few other places. Sometimes packages or organisations
> > > also have their own forums and chat rooms.
> > >
> > > In the past, Discourse has been brought up as an alternative
> > > platform that we could use instead of Google Groups and that would
> > > allow us to invite the entire Julia community into one space.
> > >
> >
> > What problem with the julia-users mailing-list and the google groups
> > web interface is solved by using discourse?
> You can have a look at the previous thread about this:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-users/4oDqW-QxyVA/lw71uqNGBQAJ
>
> I also encourage you to give a try to Discourse (this can be done
> without even creating an account on their test instance).
>
> > Why do you think (can you prove?) more centralisation will happen
> > with discourse?
> Centralization will be made possible by allowing for sub-forums
> dedicated to each topic (stats, optimization, data...) inside Discourse
> itself, instead of creating totally separate mailing lists as is
> currently done. Of course people will still be free to use something
> else, but that's quite unlikely.
>
> > > We would like to solicit feedback from the broader Julia community
> > > about moving julia-users to Discourse as well, and potentially
> > > other mailing lists like julia-stats.
> > >
> >
> > Please define 'We'.
> "We" meant "Julia core developers".
>
> > > If you have feedback or comments, please post them
> > > at http://discourse.julialang.org/t/migration-of-google-groups-to-
> > > discourse or in this thread.
> > >
> >
> > In some parts of the world, asking for feedback on a topic via a
> > different medium is seen as unfriendly act ... but still there is
> > this thread.
> The idea was that we would like to see how well it works by having
> people use Discourse for this discussion. But as you noted there's this
> thread for people who don't want to to that.
>
>
> Regards
>
> > Wishing a happy day,
> >          Andreas
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to