You won't find consensus between those who prefer Eclipse and those who prefer IntelliJ. Either we support both of them of none. Personally I still use Eclipse even if I have a an IJ license but that's more because I'm so used to use Eclipse I didn't find the time to "learn" IntelliJ rather than a personal preference. Cheers, Vincent
Le dim. 2 juin 2019 à 21:29, Simon Poole <[email protected]> a écrit : > As a non-JOSM dev, but forced to use IntelliJ now and then, and somebody > who really doesn't particularly like Eclipse: IntelliJ sucks so badly > that it makes eclipse look like the pinnacle of UI design. Just try > using IntelliJ with less than perfect eyesight, that is just one aspect > of many. > > The canonical solution would be to move to gradle as the underlying > build system, which works for both, potentially with a little bit of > work on the eclipse side (and I use that setup with a tiny weeny company > trying to make it impossible). > > Simon > > * the involvement of the tiny weeny company with IntelliJ would be a > reason on its own not to move without an alternative. > > Am 02.06.2019 um 20:59 schrieb Michael Zangl: > > I noticed that a lot of devs have changed from Eclipse to IntelliJ > > > > The free community edition is fine for working on JOSM and we have > > some ultimate licenses available if any core dev needs them. > > > > We currently have those build systems checked into our svn repository: > > * ant > > * Eclipse > > In #17218 [1] I added a first patch to support IntelliJ as well. > > The problem is: If we add support for IntelliJ, we have to update 3 > > build systems every time we change something. So it would be best to > > drop Eclipse then. Eclipse was not developed that much in the last > > view years and lacks behind IntelliJ a lot, especially when it comes > > to debugging. > > > > Therefore, I would like to get a short heads up from JOSM core devs, > > if you are using (or want to be using) IntelliJ or Eclipse (or if you > > don't care). > > > > It is probably best if we continue the discussion in the ticket. > > > > Michael > > > > [1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17218 > > > >
