Hi Lucas, all, To follow up on a conversation we had at the table:
- To register other values now, if the WG, WG chairs, and AD approve, the WG chairs can send IANA a request for RFC 7120 early allocation (see Section 3). Because this is a "Standards Action With Expert Review" registry, we would then ask the designated experts to approve as well. These would be marked "temporary," but they would be renewable. - Alternatively, if it's only important to be sure that the values come from a certain range, you could use "TBD1," "TBD2," etc., but add a sentence to the beginning of the subsection that says something like "[NOTE TO IANA: Please assign the next available values less than -53 in descending order.]" If you have any questions, just let us know. thanks, Amanda Baber IANA On Thu Mar 12 05:52:31 2026, amanda.baber wrote: > Dear Authors, > > Before the IETF meeting, we check working group agendas for documents > with IANA-related issues. We have a note about this document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-jose-pq-composite- > sigs-01 > > Requested COSE Algorithm values -51, -52, and -53 have already been > assigned to RFC 9864. > > If you have any questions, just let us know. If you'd like to talk in > person, you can find us next to the RFC Editor's table from Monday > through Thursday. You can also request another review at any time by > contacting us at [email protected]. > > For more information about IANA Considerations section requirements, > please see > > https://www.iana.org/help/protocol-registration > > Best regards, > > Amanda Baber > IANA _______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
