mjsax commented on code in PR #19625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19625#discussion_r2074367247
##########
tests/kafkatest/tests/streams/streams_standby_replica_test.py:
##########
@@ -47,19 +47,23 @@ def __init__(self, test_context):
})
@cluster(num_nodes=10)
- @matrix(metadata_quorum=[quorum.isolated_kraft])
- def test_standby_tasks_rebalance(self, metadata_quorum):
+ @matrix(metadata_quorum=[quorum.combined_kraft],
+ group_protocol=["classic", "streams"])
+ def test_standby_tasks_rebalance(self, metadata_quorum, group_protocol):
# TODO KIP-441: consider rewriting the test for
HighAvailabilityTaskAssignor
configs = self.get_configs(
- group_protocol="classic",
+ group_protocol=group_protocol,
extra_configs=
-
",sourceTopic=%s,sinkTopic1=%s,sinkTopic2=%s,internal.task.assignor.class=org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.internals.assignment.LegacyStickyTaskAssignor"
% (
+
",application.id=test_standby_tasks_rebalance,sourceTopic=%s,sinkTopic1=%s,sinkTopic2=%s,internal.task.assignor.class=org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.internals.assignment.LegacyStickyTaskAssignor"
% (
Review Comment:
Seems the `application.id` is hard-coded here, and inside
`StreamsStandByReplicaTest.java` -- wondering it this could lead to issue (in
case we change one, but forget to change the other).
Should we change `StreamsStandByReplicaTest.java` and take it as a parameter
from the Python code instead?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
