jolshan commented on code in PR #16443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16443#discussion_r1773326721
##########
metadata/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/controller/QuorumController.java:
##########
@@ -2305,11 +2307,34 @@ public CompletableFuture<UpdateFeaturesResponseData>
updateFeatures(
}).thenApply(result -> {
UpdateFeaturesResponseData responseData = new
UpdateFeaturesResponseData();
responseData.setResults(new
UpdateFeaturesResponseData.UpdatableFeatureResultCollection(result.size()));
- result.forEach((featureName, error) -> responseData.results().add(
- new UpdateFeaturesResponseData.UpdatableFeatureResult()
- .setFeature(featureName)
- .setErrorCode(error.error().code())
- .setErrorMessage(error.message())));
+ Optional<Entry<String, ApiError>> errorEntry = Optional.empty();
+ if (context.requestHeader().requestApiVersion() > 1) {
+ Stream<Entry<String, ApiError>> errorEntries =
result.entrySet().stream().filter(entry ->
+ !entry.getValue().error().equals(Errors.NONE));
+ errorEntry = errorEntries.findFirst();
+ }
+
+ if (errorEntry.isPresent()) {
+ String errorFeatureName = errorEntry.get().getKey();
+ ApiError topError = errorEntry.get().getValue();
+ String errorString = errorFeatureName + ":" +
topError.error().exceptionName() + " (" + topError.message() + ")";
+
responseData.setErrorCode(Errors.INVALID_UPDATE_VERSION.code());
Review Comment:
@junrao I guess to summarize the conversation -- does it make sense to
simply return whatever error occurred as the top level error and not invalid
update version? I would think we would still want the specific feature in the
response message so it can be communicated to the user.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
