Kirk True created KAFKA-16899:
---------------------------------
Summary: Rename MembershipManagerImpl's rebalanceTimeoutMs for
clarity
Key: KAFKA-16899
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16899
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: clients, consumer
Affects Versions: 3.8.0
Reporter: Kirk True
Fix For: 4.0.0
The naming of {{{}MembershipManagerImpl{}}}'s {{rebalanceTimeoutMs}} is a
little confusing.
Ultimately the broker enforces the rebalance process' timeout, not the client.
It's therefore a little misleading to use {{rebalanceTimeoutMs}} as the name of
a variable that only handles the client's commit portion of the process. It is
used in {{MembershipManagerImpl}} as a means to limit the client's efforts in
the case where it is repeatedly trying to commit but failing.
A suggested name change was {{{}commitTimeoutDuringReconciliation{}}}.
It is not clear to me that simply changing the name from {{rebalanceTimeoutMs}}
to {{commitTimeoutDuringReconciliation}} is sufficient. When a caller
instantiates a {{{}MembershipManagerImpl{}}}, it is passing in a variable
named {{rebalanceTimeoutMs}} that ultimately comes from the {{ClientConfig}}
object. I can imagine it being a little confusing that a value for
{{rebalanceTimeoutMs}} is passed in, but then really only used as the value for
{{commitTimeoutDuringReconciliation}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)