gharris1727 commented on code in PR #15180:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15180#discussion_r1450898354
##########
connect/runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/connect/integration/ConnectWorkerIntegrationTest.java:
##########
@@ -884,6 +890,158 @@ private void assertTimeoutException(Runnable operation,
String expectedStageDesc
connect.requestTimeout(DEFAULT_REST_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS);
}
+ /**
+ * Tests the logic around enforcement of the
+ * {@link
org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.ConnectorConfig#TASKS_MAX_CONFIG tasks.max}
+ * property and how it can be toggled via the
+ * {@link
org.apache.kafka.connect.runtime.ConnectorConfig#TASKS_MAX_ENFORCE_CONFIG
tasks.max.enforce}
+ * property, following the test plain laid out in
+ * <a
href="https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1004%3A+Enforce+tasks.max+property+in+Kafka+Connect#KIP1004:Enforcetasks.maxpropertyinKafkaConnect-TestPlan";>KIP-1004</a>.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testTasksMaxEnforcement() throws Exception {
+ String configTopic = "tasks-max-enforcement-configs";
+ workerProps.put(CONFIG_TOPIC_CONFIG, configTopic);
+ connect = connectBuilder.build();
+ // start the clusters
+ connect.start();
+
+ connect.assertions().assertAtLeastNumWorkersAreUp(
+ NUM_WORKERS,
+ "Initial group of workers did not start in time."
+ );
+
+ Map<String, String> connectorProps =
defaultSourceConnectorProps(TOPIC_NAME);
+ int maxTasks = 1;
+ connectorProps.put(TASKS_MAX_CONFIG, Integer.toString(maxTasks));
+ int numTasks = 2;
+ connectorProps.put(MonitorableSourceConnector.NUM_TASKS,
Integer.toString(numTasks));
+ connect.configureConnector(CONNECTOR_NAME, connectorProps);
+
+ // A connector that generates excessive tasks will be failed with an
expected error message
+ connect.assertions().assertConnectorIsFailedAndTasksHaveFailed(
+ CONNECTOR_NAME,
+ 0,
+ "connector did not fail in time"
+ );
+
+ String expectedErrorSnippet = String.format(
+ "The connector %s has generated %d tasks, which is greater
than %d, "
+ + "the maximum number of tasks it is configured to
create. ",
+ CONNECTOR_NAME,
+ numTasks,
+ maxTasks
+ );
+ String errorMessage =
connect.connectorStatus(CONNECTOR_NAME).connector().trace();
+ assertThat(errorMessage, containsString(expectedErrorSnippet));
+
+ // Stop all workers in the cluster
+ connect.workers().forEach(connect::removeWorker);
+
+ // Publish a set of too many task configs to the config topic, to
simulate
Review Comment:
> the constructor dependencies for the KafkaConfigBackingStore
(WorkerConfigTransformer (which itself requires a Worker instance)
I think you can get away with a null transformer, the ClusterConfigState has
null checks (and shouldn't be instantiated anyway). I agree that creating a
full WorkerConfigTransformer is going too far.
> DistributedConfig especially
Is there something I'm not seeing? You already have a workerProps, and it
gets filled out with all of the embedded cluster's details during the first
cluster start.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
