[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16194404#comment-16194404
]
Steven Aerts commented on KAFKA-6018:
-------------------------------------
This does not work, as you cannot use java 8 lambdas with abstract classes:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/24617900/612704
I will make a pull request.
> Make KafkaFuture.Function java 8 lambda compatible
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-6018
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6018
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: clients
> Reporter: Steven Aerts
>
> KafkaFuture.Function is currently an empty public abstract class.
> This means you cannot implement them as a java lambda. And you end up with
> constructs as:
> {code:java}
> new KafkaFuture.Function<Set<String>, Object>() {
> @Override
> public Object apply(Set<String> strings) {
> return foo;
> }
> }
> {code}
> I propose to define them as interfaces.
> So this code can become in java 8:
> {code:java}
> strings -> foo
> {code}
> I know this change is backwards incompatible (extends becomes implements).
> But as {{KafkaFuture}} is marked as {{@InterfaceStability.Evolving}}.
> And KafkaFuture states in its javadoc:
> {quote}This will eventually become a thin shim on top of Java 8's
> CompletableFuture.{quote}
> I think this change might be worth considering.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
