On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Voß, Marko <[email protected]>wrote:
> So I guess JiBX will overwrite the values for the BindingFactory for a > specific binding name. > > > > I would have expected JiBX to add the input bindings of binding name > FORMAT_1 to the already compiled output bindings of binding name FORMAT_1 > but that is not happening. > > > > Does anyone has any clue, how to create a workaround for this? Is this a > known issue? > I think bindings are compiled all at once, i.e., you can't do incremental binding like you are trying to do. So you can either combine your input and output bindings into a single binding (if possible), or just give them different names. -Archie -- Archie L. Cobbs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
