Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> ...
> ... if you're planning to use the XML with other tools you're probably
> better off switching to the customer name as an attribute on the fixed
> "Customer" element name, as Thomas suggested.
Whoops, I see that Thomas *didn't* suggest that. What I meant was
switching to a format like:
<customers>
<customer name="john">
<age>27</age>
</customer>
...
or, for that matter:
<customers>
<customer>
<name>John</name>
<age>27</age>
</customer>
...
- Dennis
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Dennis
>
> Dennis M. Sosnoski
> SOA and Web Services in Java
> Training and Consulting
> http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
> Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117
>
>
>
> jamesavery22 wrote:
>> Thanks Thomas
>>
>>
>> Thomas Jones-Low wrote:
>>
>>> The problem is that your example isn't valid XML as JiBX knows
>>> it. JiBX assumes you have predefined all the tag names. You either
>>> need to know the complete list of customers ahead of time or the use
>>> the structure as
>>> <customers>
>>> <customer name="john"> <age>27</age> </customer>
>>> <customer name="bill"> <age>29</age> </customer>
>>> </customers>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas Jones-Low Softstart Services Inc.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] JobScheduler for Oracle
>>> Ph: 802-398-1012 http://www.softstart.com
>>>
>>> jamesavery22 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reply. My problem is I'll never be able to put
>>>> <structure
>>>> name="John"... because "John" will never be known. Its a value in
>>>> some
>>>> class not the name of the instance of that class.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> gka wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> the binding XML will be
>>>>>
>>>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>>>> <binding value-style="attribute">
>>>>> <mapping class="Customer" name="Customer" >
>>>>> <structure name="John" map-as="commonTag"/>
>>>>> <structure name="bill" map-as="commonTag"/> </mapping>
>>>>> <mapping type-name="commonTag" class="commonTag" abstract="true">
>>>>> <value style="attribute" name= "age" field= "age"
>>>>> usage="optional"/>
>>>>> <value style="attribute" name= "age" field= "age"
>>>>> usage="optional"/>
>>>>> </mapping>
>>>>> </binding>
>>>>>
>>>>> You class definition is wrong. You will have to have a class
>>>>> definition like this
>>>>>
>>>>> public class Customer { commonTag john ; commonTag
>>>>> bill ; }
>>>>> public class commonTag{
>>>>> string name;
>>>>> string age;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> jamesavery22 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The xml I want looks like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <customers>
>>>>>> <john>
>>>>>> <age>27</age>
>>>>>> </john>
>>>>>> <bill>
>>>>>> <age>29</age>
>>>>>> </bill>
>>>>>> </customers>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and the class is like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> public class Customer {
>>>>>> private string name;
>>>>>> private string age;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can I just get the structure name to be based on the field
>>>>>> "name?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
>>> challenge
>>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
>>> prizes
>>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
>>> world
>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jibx-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
