Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group (CRG) has filed this petition in public 
interest to highlight the plight of thousands of students with disabilities and 
particularly those suffering from visual impairment, hearing impairment and 
mental retardation studying in Delhi Government schools and MCD schools. The 
petitioner has highlighted that the schools are without trained teachers 
including teachers qualified in sign language and/or Braille. The authorities 
have failed to provide a barrier free environment in these schools. The special 
books and equipments needed for the education of the students with disabilities 
are also not being provided to them by the schools. It is submitted by the 
petitioner that this inaction on the part of the respondents results in 
violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to such students under Articles 14, 
15, 21 and 21-A of the Constitution of India. It is contended that there is 
also a violation of the provisions of Persons with Disabilities (Equal 
Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.

Reference is also made to UN Convention on the Rights of Child (1989), 
Salamancha Statement (UNESCO, 1994) and UN Convention on the Rights of Persons 
with Disabilities (2008). The Government of NCT of Delhi runs about 1000 
schools whereas Municipal Corporation of Delhi runs about 1800 schools in 
Delhi. About 12 lakhs students study in Delhi Government schools whereas around 
10 lakhs students study in MCD run schools. Besides these schools, there are 
schools run by NDMC and Delhi Cantonment Board. The petitioner has alleged that 
the schools are totally unequipped to teach the differently abled students. It 
is alleged that the absence of specially trained teachers for the students 
suffering from disabilities and particularly those suffering from visual 
impairment, hearing impairment and mental retardation has resulted in early 
drop outs from the schools. It is submitted that respondents are 
constitutionally and statutorily obliged to ensure that all the children with 
disabilities are not only brought within the mainstream school system but also 
to provide them with all requisite educational environment and facilities 
including teachers qualified in sign language and/or Braille, so that they 
acquire necessary educational skills. By failing to do so, the respondents are 
committing serious violation of the human rights of the children with 
disabilities.

On the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, National Council for 
Education, Research and Training (NCERT) and National Council for Teachers 
Education (NCTE) were impleaded as respondents. Certain other institutions 
specialized in running the schools for disabled children were also impleaded as 
respondents. The Government of NCT of Delhi has constituted the committees for 
improving the conditions in the schools for children with special needs. NCERT 
has also placed on record a note titled ?Road Map to Providing Education to 
Children with Special Needs?. The note also indicates the list of institutes in 
Delhi and other parts of the country which impart training for teaching 
children with special needs. On the direction of the Court, a further 
comprehensive note suggesting the mode of improvement in education of disabled 
children in NCTE of Delhi has been filed by NCERT. The note filed by NCERT 
reveals that as per Census 2001, about 2% of the total population constitutes 
persons with disabilities. The National Curriculum Framework on School 
Education (NCF-2005) by the NCERT has recommended making the curriculum 
flexible and appropriate to accommodate the diversity of school children 
including those with disability in both cognitive and non-cognitive areas.

The National Focus Group (NFG) of NCERT has emphasized that all children with 
disabilities have the right to and should be educated in general schools along 
with their non-disabled counterparts. It is pointed out that in November, 2005, 
the Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India, has devised 
The National Action Plan for Inclusion in Education of Children and Youth with 
Disabilities (IECYD) developed by emphasizing the inclusion of children and 
young persons with disabilities in all general educational settings (the 
Inclusive Education System) from Early Childhood to Higher Education. The goal 
of the Action Plan is- “to ensure the inclusion of children and youth with 
disabilities in all available general educational settings, by providing them 
with a learning environment that is available, accessible, affordable and 
appropriate”.

Under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA), financial support for inclusion of 
children with disabilities in general schools at the elementary level @ 
Rs.1,200/- per child with special needs per annum has been provided. The 
Ministry of HDR, Government of India, has also funded another Centrally 
Sponsored Scheme (CSS) of Inclusive Education of the Disabled at Secondary 
State Children (IEDSS) which is envisaged to enable all children and young 
persons with disabilities to have access to secondary education and to improve 
their enrolment, retention and achievement in the general education system. 
This IEDSS Scheme aims to enable all students with disabilities completing 
eight years of elementary schooling an opportunity to complete four years of 
secondary schooling in an inclusive and enabling environment and to provide 
educational opportunities and facilities to students with disabilities in the 
general education system at the secondary level. The scheme covers all children 
of age 14+ passing out of elementary schools and studying in secondary stage in 
Government, local body and Government-aided-schools, with one or more 
disabilities as defined under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 and the 
National Trust Act, 1999 in the age group of 14+ to 18+ (classes IX to XII). 
Some important components of the scheme are that it is proposed to provide 
assistance to States / Union Territories / Autonomous Bodies @Rs.3,000/- per 
disabled child per annum for certain specified components described therein, 
including stipend @ Rs.200/- per month for girl child at the secondary level to 
encourage their participation upto senior secondary level. The scheme also 
envisages other support like adaptations in Examination procedures etc. Our 
attention is also drawn to certain schemes and funds sponsored by the Delhi 
Government to promote inclusion of children with disabilities in its schools 
under SSA, YUVA and BaLA (Building as Learning Aid) through free textbooks 
including Braille books, required aid and appliances uniform subsidy of 
Rs.500/-, improved school buildings, establishment of resource centres, teacher 
training under SSA etc. The Department of Education has identified about 10065 
differently abled children, out of which, 7694 have been assessed on the basis 
of check list provided by the SCERT and about 2824 have been recommended for 
aid/appliances. There are certain other fund allocations provided by Department 
of Education for transport allowance, reader allowance, escort allowance etc.

NCERT has suggested the following imperative steps needed for further uniform 
norms and standards and providing facilities in schools for children with 
special needs:



“1. Mapping Identifying CWSN age wise, class wise and gender wise in different 
districts block and cluster-wise. Placement in neighbouring schools and zero 
rejection admission policy to be uniformly applied to all Schools, both Govt. 
and Govt.-aided. Fresh assessment of requirements for types of books, 
appliances and other material.

2. Improving Infrastructure and Support System



Wooden ramps to be provided in schools. At least ground floor to be made 
accessible. Removing infrastructural barriers-windows not opening inside, 
playground/inside roads made barrier free, etc. Resource rooms to be set up 
initially for clusters of schools.

LONG TERM

Ramps in schools to be made in pahses-Percentage of schools to be covered every 
years. Stairs to have support system. Disabled friendly toilets in all schools. 
No child with disabilities should be asked to produce certificates either for 
admission, examination, getting support facilities / scholarships etc. Reject 
the policy of failing students vis-?-vis enabling each child to overcome 
perceived difficulties.



3. Upgrading Human Resources and Management of Curricular Aspects Morning 
Assembly and functions to include ALL children. Orientation programmes for 
different categories of administrators. Provision of resource rooms and 
equipment for the resource rooms in one school per block/urban cluster. 
Appointment of Special Educators: Special Educators will be appointed in the 
ratio 1:5. Ideally every school where disabled children are enrolled should 
have the services of at least one special teacher. If the number of children 
are less, this teacher could also work for other schools in the cluster. 
Creating a set of resource persons at district level. Special classes to be 
organized in schools ONLY to start with. Flexibility in evaluation and exam 
rules and regulations.

Preparation of supplementary learning materials for MR, HI and slow learners. 
Appointment of special teachers and counselors in schools. ETE and NTT syllabus 
to be reviewed and revised from viewpoint of inclusion. Creating network of 
special and general schools. Setting up forums for redressal of parent’s 
grievances. Crash programme for all general teachers in classroom management, 
delivery system and teaching strategies through DIETs. Revamping in-service 
teacher training programsmes. Volunteer groups of teachers to be created in all 
districts. Multidisciplinary Resource Teams (MRT) to be established in all 
districts to include Para medical professionals, psychologists and counselors, 
school administrators, general and special teachers, Special Education and 
rehabilitation experts, parents and care givers.

4. Public Awareness and Sensitization Details of Special schools and trained 
special teachers to be put on website (district wise) to be used by schools as 
resources. These should also be advertised in electronic media, Bill-boards and 
cinema halls. Citizens to be requested to extend all sorts of help. Web portals 
and online interaction to be created. Wide use of ICT in education to be 
promoted. More incentives/awards/certification to be promoted.”

A list of aids, appliances and materials required at various levels is also 
attached to the note submitted by NCERT. Learned counsel appearing for the 
petitioner has brought to our notice an enactment passed by the Goa Government 
in 2003. This Act contains comprehensive provisions to protect, promote and 
preserve the basic interests of child and to create a society that is found to 
be child friendly. The enactment deals with various aspects like education, 
health and nutrition, children’s home, child labour, etc. and also makes 
stringent provisions relating to child sexual trafficking and other abuses of 
the children and provides penalties for violations. The Government of NCT of 
Delhi may consider introducing an enactment on similar lines providing for the 
child rights. The Secretary (Education) who appeared before this Court has 
assured the Court that the Government of NCT of Delhi will ensure full 
implementation of the short term and long term measures as suggested by the 
NCERT. We direct the State Government to ensure full compliance with all short 
term measures on or before the 30th June, 2009 and the long term measures shall 
be implemented by the end of June, 2010.

We hereby constitute an Advisory Committee consisting of the following to 
advise the Government in all matters relating to providing education to 
children with disabilities in general/special schools:

i) Secretary (Education) shall be the Chairperson of the Committee;

ii) Director, SCERT;

iii) Member Secretary of NCTE or his nominee;

iv) Nominee of Rehabilitation Council of India;

v) Director, National Association of Blinds;

vi) President, Delhi Society for Mental Retarded.

vii) Principal, Rajkiya Lady Noise Mook Badhir Madhyamik Vidyalaya;

viii) In-charge of IEDC Cell (Dept. of Education) or his nominee;

ix) Additional Commissioner (Education), MCD or his nominee;

x) Secretary, NDMC or his nominee;

xi) Secretary, Delhi Cantonment Board or his nominee; and

xii) Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate.



We also constitute a Monitoring Committee under the Chairmanship of Secretary 
(Education), Government of NCT of Delhi including the following to supervise, 
monitor and ensure implementation of the short term and long term measures 
suggested by NCERT:



i) Secretary (Education), GNCTD, as Chairman;

ii) Chief Secretary, Persons with Disabilities;

iii) Member Secretary of NCTE or his nominee;

iv) Nominee of Rehabilitation Council of India;

v) Additional Commissioner (Education), MCD or his nominee;

vi) Secretary, NDMC or his nominee;

vii) Secretary, Delhi Cantonment Board or his nominee.

It will be open for the Secretary (Education) to adopt any other person as 
member of the Advisory Committee and/or Monitoring Committee. The Secretary 
(Education) will file an action taken report to this Court within 12 weeks.

Adjourned to 20th May, 2009. Copy of this order may be sent to all the 
authorities and/or members of the committees constituted by us.

CHIEF JUSTICE

SANJIV KHANNA, J

FEBRUARY 19, 2009

Reply via email to