On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/11/2016 12:00 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote: >> jfs uses nanosecond granularity for filesystem timestamps. >> Only this assignment is not using nanosecond granularity. >> Use current_time() to get the right granularity. > > I had thought these were being handled as a group. I'll push this one > through the jfs tree.
Yes, that was the original plan. Then, Greg suggested pushing only the big patches as a group and sending individual filesystem patches separately. Big patches introducing current_time() have been merged in 4.9 rc1. -Deepa ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
