Take a look and see if you find any issues :)

https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/3114

> On Nov 14, 2018, at 11:02 AM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sounds like you have all the skills to make a PR for this. :-)
> 
> It's an interesting concept, and we are currently working on getting 9.4.14 
> out the door, so that means we can test this theory out soon.
> 
> Joakim Erdfelt / [email protected]
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:40 PM Steven Schlansker 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Olivier, Felipe, Joakim:
> 
> I’ve read up on the issue a bit and I do wonder if the ‘flatten’ plugin may 
> be exactly what is needed here.
> 
> My understanding of the issue as it stands (and please correct me if I’m 
> wrong) is that the `bom` artifact
> is stuck in an unpleasant place where it wants to inherit important 
> configuration (release, repos, license, etc)
> related to its own release, but doing so also drags dependencyManagement 
> inappropriately into the bom.
> 
> To avoid this, we are currently copy+pasting the relevant POM bits between 
> parent and bom, and have some
> franken-release process where the release manager can forget to release the 
> bom.  This sucks.
> 
> The flatten-maven-plugin allows you to selectively transform a POM before 
> publishing it.
> 
> So, we could have the bom pom inherit parent, and get the important 
> configuration for the Jetty build to succeed.
> It can participate as a full module in the Jetty project with Jetty parent as 
> is desired, which means it also works with the release plugin.
> 
> During BOM build, we can invoke the `flatten` plugin as Felipe suggests, and 
> configure it to `keep` the dependencyManagement section as is.
> We can also configure it to leave license, developers, whatever is really 
> necessary - and then strip out essentially every other section, especially 
> the parent.
> 
> Then, via the 'updatePomFile' configuration, it will replace the bom pom with 
> the flattened and cleaned up version.
> 
> This allows us to have our cake (the bom inherits build configuration from 
> parent) and eat it too (without passing it downstream to bom importers).
> 
> If this is a fair assessment of the problem as it stands, and you agree the 
> solution sounds workable,
> we could open a PR for discussion with Felipe's changes as below.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 
> > On Nov 13, 2018, at 3:29 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi 
> > You should read the discussion here 
> > https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/1527 
> > Cheers
> > Olivier
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:23 PM Filipe Sousa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Not sure I understand the problem with the BOM. Adding a parent to the 
> > jetty-bom like you do with the other modules and use flatten-maven-plugin 
> > to clean up the BOM should work.
> > 
> > diff --git a/jetty-bom/pom.xml b/jetty-bom/pom.xml
> > index abb972743e..0c4beadb73 100644
> > --- a/jetty-bom/pom.xml
> > +++ b/jetty-bom/pom.xml
> > @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
> >  <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; 
> > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; 
> > xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
> > http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";>
> > -  <groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId>
> > +  <parent>
> > +    <groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId>
> > +    <artifactId>jetty-project</artifactId>
> > +    <version>9.4.14-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > +  </parent>
> >    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
> >    <artifactId>jetty-bom</artifactId>
> > -  <version>9.4.14-SNAPSHOT</version>
> >    <name>Jetty :: Bom</name>
> >    <description>Jetty BOM artifact</description>
> >    <url>http://www.eclipse.org/jetty</url>
> > @@ -87,6 +90,40 @@
> >          </plugin>
> >        </plugins>
> >      </pluginManagement>
> > +    <plugins>
> > +      <plugin>
> > +        <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> > +        <artifactId>flatten-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > +        <version>1.0.1</version>
> > +        <configuration>
> > +          <outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}</outputDirectory>
> > +          <flattenedPomFilename>flattened-pom.xml</flattenedPomFilename>
> > +          <flattenMode>oss</flattenMode>
> > +          <updatePomFile>true</updatePomFile>
> > +          
> > <embedBuildProfileDependencies>true</embedBuildProfileDependencies>
> > +          <pomElements>
> > +            <build>remove</build>
> > +            <dependencyManagement>keep</dependencyManagement>
> > +          </pomElements>
> > +        </configuration>
> > +        <executions>
> > +          <execution>
> > +            <id>flatten</id>
> > +            <goals>
> > +              <goal>flatten</goal>
> > +            </goals>
> > +            <phase>process-resources</phase>
> > +          </execution>
> > +          <execution>
> > +            <id>flatten.clean</id>
> > +            <goals>
> > +              <goal>clean</goal>
> > +            </goals>
> > +            <phase>clean</phase>
> > +          </execution>
> > +        </executions>
> > +      </plugin>
> > +    </plugins>
> >    </build>
> >  
> >    <dependencyManagement>
> > 
> > 
> >> On 13 Nov 2018, at 00:45, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> You are absolutely right, the jetty-bom is missing. :-(
> >> 
> >> This is because the jetty-bom is a bastard module that is impossible to 
> >> play nice within the maven, all plugins refuse to updates the versions 
> >> within it, as it's not quite within the reactor, nor capable of 
> >> participating within the normal build hierarchy due to the inane rules on 
> >> boms that force this behavior on the rest of the project.
> >> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/jetty-9.4.13.v20181111/jetty-bom/pom.xml#L5
> >> 
> >> Unfortunately, now that the tag jetty-9.4.13.v20181111 has been created we 
> >> cannot touch that tag (as they are referenced within the jar artifacts 
> >> themselves via both the ref and the commit ids).
> >> We cannot release jetty-bom using the normal build tools and processes now.
> >> This will be a manual process, be aware that it can take a while to sort 
> >> out (up to a week).
> >> 
> >> Joakim Erdfelt / [email protected]
> >> 
> >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:19 PM Steven Schlansker 
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi Joakim,
> >> 
> >> Excited to try Jetty 9.4.13!  However, it seems that the `bom` artifact 
> >> may have been left behind.
> >> 
> >> According to Maven Central,
> >> 
> >> org.eclipse.jetty
> >> Artifact ID
> >> jetty-server
> >> Latest Version
> >> 9.4.13.v20181111
> >> 
> >> org.eclipse.jetty
> >> Artifact ID
> >> jetty-bom
> >> Latest Version
> >> 9.4.12.v20180830
> >> 
> >> I apologize if this is due to impatience coupled with inconsistent 
> >> mirroring delays or some other technical glitch, but it sure looks like 
> >> the `jetty-bom` artifact may not have been released.
> >> 
> >> > On Nov 12, 2018, at 11:23 AM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > The Jetty team is happy to announce the immediate availability of a 
> >> > newest release for the Eclipse Jetty 9.4.x branch.
> >> > ...
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> jetty-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
> >> from this list, visit
> >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> jetty-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
> >> from this list, visit
> >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > jetty-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
> > from this list, visit
> > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Olivier
> > _______________________________________________
> > jetty-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
> > from this list, visit
> > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
> this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
> this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users

_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users

Reply via email to