>Regarding performance, I'm quite happy with the dev version of jemalloc. It is significantly faster, and its memory layout refinements tend to decrease fragmentation.
Please forgive me if this was covered before, I only check in from time to time. Is there specific commit(s) or a link with a description of the changes for that comment above. Specifically the memory layout refinements ? Thanks, -Dave On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Jason Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Rich Prohaska <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is the head of the dev branch good for production? > > I tested the dev version of jemalloc pretty extensively in a production > environment back in November. My experience (after fixing many > regressions) was that it is stable, though it's likely that some subtle > regressions have not yet surfaced. Additionally, I remain somewhat > uncertain about the stability of the new heap profiling implementation, but > I've fixed all the issues I'm aware of. > > Regarding performance, I'm quite happy with the dev version of jemalloc. > It is significantly faster, and its memory layout refinements tend to > decrease fragmentation. > > Jason > _______________________________________________ > jemalloc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.canonware.com/mailman/listinfo/jemalloc-discuss >
_______________________________________________ jemalloc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.canonware.com/mailman/listinfo/jemalloc-discuss
