> I hope MemoryImageSource is not going to be > depricated!!! > > I use it big time in all my applets. > > What would be the replacement for MemoryImageSource? > I hope > ou aren't thinking that BufferedImage is better. > BufferedImage > s a giant, poorly thought out hairball...
Well, it about the same as Image.getScaledInstance() - and old API which will work in future too but maybe with suboptimal results. I don't understand why you think that BufferedImages are bad, at least for bringing down the results SoftwareRendering to screen they are as good as they can be. lg Clemens [Message sent by forum member 'linuxhippy' (linuxhippy)] http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=269307 =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA2D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
