I've complained several times in another thread, so far no response,
that JabRef 3.4 destroyed the @Comment{jabref-meta: groupstree: section
of my .bib databases. The group tree is present, but has lost all
keywords.I don't see how this could have happened through my blundering. I can recover that section from all my databases from a backup when still running JabRef 9.10 two weeks ago. I did this with a database, but a major problem remains. If I create a new group, it is not added to the groupstree, but is recorded somewhere else. Also, creating a link from an entry to a group creates a link to all groups with the same name. Please!!! Someone tell me what's going on. Has a new group mechanism been created? Where is that information being stored? Was it supposed to recover groupstree data from the .bib databases? I'll have to create links from entries to groups by entering the information into the databases by hand, but I worry that JabRef 3.4 will again destroy that information. Haines Brown ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e _______________________________________________ Jabref-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users
