nandorKollar commented on PR #3924: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3924#issuecomment-4016224488
> > I think we should also think about catalog federation too. I think we should not federate events, [...] > > I assume this proposal is limited to events stored in Polaris. > > In general (future), if Polaris federates catalogs, why would we not want to federate events (which are going to the part of the catalog API in Iceberg)?.. but this is a different topic, probably worth a separate discussion 🤔 Totally agree, this should be a separate discussion, it is out of scope for this proposal. I told that we shouldn't federate the events, because I though that they are considered 'local' for a given catalog. Both local and remote catalog track the events independently, but it probably makes more sense to federate events too. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
