[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=335532#comment-335532
]
Benson Margulies commented on MCHECKSTYLE-166:
----------------------------------------------
Well, how about a patch with an integration test?
> Drop @requiresDependencyResolution test
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: MCHECKSTYLE-166
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-166
> Project: Maven Checkstyle Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.8
> Environment: N/A
> Reporter: Ernst de Haan
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, the
> [{{CheckstyleViolationCheckMojo}}|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-checkstyle-plugin-2.8/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/checkstyle/CheckstyleViolationCheckMojo.java?revision=1188083&view=markup]
> class declares:{code}@requiresDependencyResolution test{code}However, that
> should not be necessary. Checkstyle works on source files, not on bytecode.
> If this declaration would be removed, then this Checkstyle plugin should
> still work perfectly fine (I would expect without any further code changes).
> The advantage would be that in our Continuous Integration pipeline I can skip
> the _compile_ stage and immediately trigger the _checkstyle_ stage. That
> would save us multiple minutes on the feedback roundtrip.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
