[ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEAR-171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=324027#comment-324027
 ] 

Darryl L. Miles commented on MEAR-171:
--------------------------------------

This is the code that currently implements "full"

https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ear-plugin/xref/org/apache/maven/plugin/ear/output/FullFileNameMapping.html#35

                
> Full customization of FileNameMapping is needed (WTF is the "full" mode?  This
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MEAR-171
>                 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEAR-171
>             Project: Maven 2.x Ear Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.8
>            Reporter: Darryl L. Miles
>
> What is the logic with the seemingly non-standard conversion groupId by 
> replacing '.' with '-' in the "full" mode ?  Surely this mode should have 
> been called "full-with-groupId-rewrite".
> The purpose of this decision should have been documented in the code, someone 
> needs to do so or make this format obsolete.
> Alternately the field should look at the maven-war-plugin and the ability to 
> support mapping like:
> @{groupId}@.@{artifactId}@@{dashClassifier?}@-@{version}@.@{extension}@
> Also the ${project.finalName} and ${project.name} would be useful (taken out 
> of the dependency's own POM, not the EAR project).
> If this unusual replacement of groupId is required, then maybe 
> @{groupIdReplaceDots}@ can be provided.
> The problem is that the names used are IMPORTANT to know and automate because 
> it maybe necessary to place them on the Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF files.
> This non-standard choice needs to be explained because it really is 
> non-intuitive and there are no other mechanisms across the maven plugins to 
> manage and rewrite Class-Path values in accordance with this convention.  
> There is on the other hand clear ways to configure a project and decide on 
> the output file names on a project by project basis.  This is what should be 
> the default, what the project itself decided it wanted to be called like 
> ${project.finalName}.
> The Maven documentation should include complete example of this "full" 
> behaviour along with explanation of why it is useful to the user.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to