[ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=292547#comment-292547
 ] 

Dale Wijnand commented on MNG-2205:
-----------------------------------

I really like the 3rd solution given by Sei Syvalta 
(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2205?focusedCommentId=131081&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-131081).

I'd like to vote that one in particular.

I think it would make for more stable builds (or rather updating dependencies), 
such as:
Dozer (net.sf.dozer:dozer:jar:5.3.2) currently depends on 
commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:2.5
If in my project I compile-time depend on dozer, I also have commons-lang on 
the compile classpath.
If I Dozer's next version refactors everything to use Google's Guava instead 
(com.google.guava:guava:jar:11.0.2), then my code will break.. for something 
(basically) completely unrelated.
                
> "provided" scope dependencies must be transitive
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-2205
>                 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2205
>             Project: Maven 2 & 3
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Dependencies
>            Reporter: David Boden
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.x / Backlog
>
>         Attachments: transitivetest.zip
>
>
> A provided scope dependency can also be thought of as "compile-only".
> Project A requires Sybase JConnect on the runtime classpath. Project A 
> declares a "provided" dependency on Sybase JConnect.
> Project B depends upon Project A. Project B declares a "compile" dependency 
> on Project A.
> Project C depends upon Project B. Project C declares a "compile" dependency 
> on Project B.
> C
> | - compile dependency
> B
> | - compile dependency
> A
> | - provided dependency
> Sybase JConnect
> So, does Project C transitively depend on Sybase JConnect. Yes, of course! 
> The "provided" dependency needs to be transitive.
> Ultimately, when Project C gets deployed, Sybase JConnect needs to be 
> somewhere on the runtime classpath in order for the application to function. 
> It's valid for Project C to assume that Sybase JConnect is available and use 
> JDBC all over the Project C code. Project C is safe to do this because it can 
> happily deduce that Sybase JConnect will be there in the runtime environment 
> because Project A NEEDS IT.
> I've got Use Cases all over my aggregated build which make it absolutely 
> critical and common sense that provided scope dependencies are transitive. 
> For the (very rare) odd case where you don't want to inherit provided 
> dependencies, you can <exclude/> them.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to