[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=251657#action_251657
 ] 

Arnaud Heritier commented on MNG-4975:
--------------------------------------

Ok, thus for readers I confirm Benjamin's assertion.
I misunderstood the order of plugin executions inside a phase : They have to 
follow the order in the POM. Thus if I put profile 2 before profile 1, with 
maven 2.X and both profiles activated I have 00->01->02->05->06->03->04
Thus there is a bug in Maven 3, in my sample build executions (00,01,02) should 
always be executed before profiles executions but it won't follow execution IDs 
(they could be 46, 32, 57)
Note that in an inheritance chain child executions are always done after parent 
executions

> [regression] plugin executions injected from profile run before instead of 
> after existing executions in the POM
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-4975
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4975
>             Project: Maven 2 & 3
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Plugins and Lifecycle
>    Affects Versions: 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2
>         Environment: I reproduced the problem with maven 3.0, 3.0.1 and 
> 3.0.2. It doesn't exist in 2.2.1
> MacOS 1.6 JVM
>            Reporter: Arnaud Heritier
>         Attachments: pom.xml
>
>
> Let's imagine we have a lifecycle phase where we want to bind several mojos. 
> We want to force the order of execution of our mojos in this phase thus we 
> use ordered execution IDs (00exec, 01exec, ...).
> In project's build part we define 00exec, 01exec, 02exec
> In a profile #1 we define 03exec,04exec
> In a profile #2 we define 05exec,06exec
> If I execute my build without profiles I want to see the execution of 
> 00->01->02
> If I activate profile #1 I want to see the execution of  00->01->02->03->04
> If I activate profile #2 I want to see the execution of  
> 00->01->02->03->04->05->06
> This the behavior we have in Maven 2.X. Any combinaison of profiles will 
> ensure executions are ordered following IDs order
> In Maven 3.x it is no more the case.
> Without profile we have 00->01->02 (GREAT)
> With Profile 1 activate we have : 03->04->00->01->02 ( :( )
> With Profile 1 & 2 activate we have : 05->06->03->04->00->01->02 ( :( )
> I attach a simple testcase with an antrun to show the problem. 
> Just play with {{mvn package}} and profiles {{profile1}} & {{profile2}}
> Note that the order depends also of the order of profiles declaration in the 
> POM in M3
> If profile1 is defined before profile 2 I have 05->06->03->04->00->01->02
> If profile2 is defined before profile 1 I have 03->04->05->06->00->01->02

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to