[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

John Casey closed MASSEMBLY-338.
--------------------------------

       Resolution: Won't Fix
    Fix Version/s: 2.2-beta-6
         Assignee: John Casey

using outputFileNameMapping is the correct approach, since the finalName 
parameter in a Maven build pertains only to the filename in the target 
directory, not to any of the subsequent handling by consumers.

An interesting idea would be to use 
${artifact.build.finalName}-${artifact.baseVersion}.${artifact.extension}, 
which should work in 2.2-beta-6 and later.

> Overridden artifact finalName is ignored by the assembly plugin.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MASSEMBLY-338
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-338
>             Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.2-beta-1
>         Environment: Maven 2.0.9, JDK 6, WinXP SP2
>            Reporter: Michael Osipov
>            Assignee: John Casey
>             Fix For: 2.2-beta-6
>
>         Attachments: assemblyMapping.png
>
>
> I have a multimodule project.
> groupId: net.fckeditor
> Parent ArtifactId: fckeditor-java
> 1. module ArtifactId: java-core; finalName 
> "fckeditor-${artifactId}-${version}" though => e.g. 
> fckeditor-java-core-2.4-SNAPSHOT
> 2. module ArtifactId: java-demo; finalName 
> "fckeditor-${artifactId}-${version}" though
> I did create a bin assembly. The assembly contains the jars but their names 
> do not correspond to the overridden finalNames.
> An example picture is attached and the project can be checked out at our 
> [trac|http://dev.fckeditor.net/browser/FCKeditor.Java/trunk] and the 
> [SVN|http://svn.fckeditor.net/FCKeditor.Java/trunk/] directly.
> Checkout the 
> [bin.xml|http://dev.fckeditor.net/browser/FCKeditor.Java/trunk/src/main/assembly/bin.xml]
>  and comment out the first outputFileNameMapping and run "mvn clean site 
> package assembly:assembly".
> You should be able to reproduce the problem.
> I did find a workaround for the problem by defining the outputFileNameMapping 
> as same as in the modules poms. This works just because all modules have the 
> same finalName remapping.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to