[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=228721#action_228721 ]
Erik Brakkee commented on MJAVADOC-268: --------------------------------------- I can also confirm it still exists in version 2.7. Reverting back to 2.5 solves the problem, however with only drawback which is that there is no multi-module javadoc available for the overall site. At least my site generation time reduces now from 45 minutes to about 7. > performance problem in AbstractJavadocMojo.getModulesLinks() > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: MJAVADOC-268 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-268 > Project: Maven 2.x Javadoc Plugin > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 2.6 > Environment: Apache Maven 2.2.0 (r788681; 2009-06-26 15:04:01+0200) > Java version: 1.6.0_13 > Java home: /home/mkleint/javatools/jdk1.6.0_13/jre > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.29.6-desktop-2mnb" arch: "i386" Family: "unix" > Reporter: Milos Kleint > Assignee: Vincent Siveton > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.6.1 > > Attachments: javadoc.patch > > > The getModulesLinks() method is unacceptably slow under certain conditions: > 1. project's url is defined > 2. one or more projects in reactor do not have any java sources and are not > of "pom" packaging. > For such projects the apidocs/ output folder is never created resulting in > repeated invokation of a forked javadoc goal. It's more severe with high > number of modules in reactor and high number of modules without any java > sources. > as an example checkout "hg clone https://hg.kenai.com/hg/forceten~src" > The immediate problem is in the apidocsFile.exists() condition that > re-triggers the forked invokation. The attached patch fixes that. However it > looks suspicitions that the method is being called repeatedly for each module > at all. Maybe the aborting condition at the start of the method body is wrong > (I was not able to decypher that) > workaround is to use 2.5 or not to specify the url in pom.xml or set the > detectOfflineLinks parameter to "false". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira