[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=222840#action_222840
 ] 

Carlo de Wolf commented on MRELEASE-565:
----------------------------------------

I'm going to remove the bom-eap5-0.1.2 tag, but I'll keep the MRELEASE-91 
branch alive for review: 
http://github.com/wolfc/jboss-ejb3-bom-eap5/commits/MRELEASE-91

> CLONE -Updating of dependencyManagement inconsistent with updating of 
> dependencies with regard to SNAPSHOTs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MRELEASE-565
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-565
>             Project: Maven 2.x Release Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-beta-4
>         Environment: maven 2.0.4, win XP
>            Reporter: Carlo de Wolf
>            Assignee: Emmanuel Venisse
>             Fix For: 2.0-beta-5
>
>
> The mechanism in release:prepare for creating the new development version of 
> POM's handles snapshots that are part of the current reactor build 
> differently for dependencyManagement and for dependencies.
> A snapshot version in a dependencies section will be updated to the next 
> development version whereas one in dependencyManagement won't.
> The attached patch will change this behavior. It will update a snapshot 
> version under dependencyManagement if and only if it is part of the current 
> reactor build.
> Note that dependencies cannot contain snapshot versions that are not part of 
> the current reactor, but dependencyManagement can. I suggest to forbid this 
> too.
> A second suggestion is to introduce a parameter to control the updating of 
> snapshot dependencies in both dependencyManagement and dependencies sections. 
> Either leave them at the released version or update them to the new 
> development version. This touches on the discussion in MRELEASE-36 about the 
> developer having to knowingly choose to use a new development version. I 
> would be fine with using a parameter to select the behavior as obtained with 
> my patch. My central point is that dependencyManagement and dependencies 
> snapshots should behave the same.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to