[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason van Zyl closed MNG-2409.
------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2.x)
3.x
> @requiresDependencyResolution re-resolves transitive dependencies
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-2409
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2409
> Project: Maven 2 & 3
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Dependencies
> Affects Versions: 2.0.4
> Reporter: Stepan Roh
> Fix For: 3.x
>
> Attachments: test.rdr.zip
>
>
> Consider this scenario:
> project A
> project B, depends on A
> project C, to be compiled, depends on B
> projects A and B are from artifact repository, project C is being compiled
> Let's say that before phase compile of project C my plugin is called which
> looks for all dependencies of C (in our case A and B) and change their file
> (Artifact.setFile()). All those dependencies are already resolved. Then
> compile:compile is run which has @requiresDependencyResolution compile which
> leads to A being re-resolved = it loses my file, but B retains it:
> original A.getFile() = a.jar
> original B.getFile() = b.jar
> changed A.getFile() = xa.jar
> changed B.getFile() = xb.jar
> after compile A.getFile() = a.jar
> after compile B.getFile() = xb.jar
> Attached archive contains all necessary source code (source of A, B, C and
> test Mojo) to recreate the situation. Just do:
> unzip test.rdr.zip
> cd test.rdr
> ( cd project-a; mvn install )
> ( cd project-b; mvn install )
> ( cd maven-refile-plugin; mvn install )
> ( cd project-c; mvn install )
> The output of last mvn install will be something like (edited for brevity):
> [INFO] [refile:set-file {execution: set}]
> [INFO] Dependency: test.rdr:project-b:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT:compile
> [INFO] resolved: true
> [INFO] file: .../project-b-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> [INFO] new file: .../project-b-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar
> [INFO] Dependency: test.rdr:project-a:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT:compile
> [INFO] resolved: true
> [INFO] file: .../project-a-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> [INFO] new file: .../project-a-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar
> [INFO] Compile classpath: [target\classes,
> .../project-b-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar,
> .../project-a-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar]
> [INFO] [refile:show-file {execution: show-before-compile}]
> [INFO] Dependency: test.rdr:project-b:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT:compile
> [INFO] resolved: true
> [INFO] file: .../project-b-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar
> [INFO] Dependency: test.rdr:project-a:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT:compile
> [INFO] resolved: true
> [INFO] file: .../project-a-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar
> [INFO] Compile classpath: [target\classes,
> .../project-b-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar,
> .../project-a-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar]
> [INFO] [resources:resources]
> [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> [INFO] [compiler:compile]
> [INFO] Nothing to compile - all classes are up to date
> [INFO] [refile:show-file {execution: show-after-compile}]
> [INFO] Dependency: test.rdr:project-b:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT:compile
> [INFO] resolved: true
> [INFO] file: .../project-b-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar
> [INFO] Dependency: test.rdr:project-a:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT:compile
> [INFO] resolved: true
> [INFO] file: .../project-a-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> [INFO] Compile classpath: [target\classes,
> .../project-b-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.new.jar, .../project-a-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar]
> ...
> As you can see after compile is run, project A's file is back to original
> value, but B retained new file. I think this is a strange behaviour and
> should be changed to act one way or another, preferably that already resolved
> dependencies are not re-resolved.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
