[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Brian Fox closed MENFORCER-73.
------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.0-beta-2

I updated the error message to suggest the use of dependency:tree. Embedding 
the tree function inside a rule is a major undertaking that I think would 
introduce more problems than it solves.

> Display dependency "path" when bannedDependencies rule fails
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MENFORCER-73
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-73
>             Project: Maven 2.x Enforcer Plugin
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Standard Rules
>    Affects Versions: 1.0-beta-1
>            Reporter: Baptiste MATHUS
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.0-beta-2
>
>
> At the moment, when bannedDependencies rule is violated, something like the 
> following is printed:
> {quote} [WARNING] Rule 2: 
> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.BannedDependencies failed with message:
> Found Banned Dependency: commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1{quote}
> I guess it would be great if this rule could print the same output than 
> dependency:tree -Dincludes=the-specified-artifact/group. It would give 
> something like:
> {quote} [WARNING] Rule 2: 
> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.BannedDependencies failed with message:
> Found Banned Dependency: commons-logging:commons-logging:jar:1.1.1 :
> somegroupId:someArtifactId:jar:1.0.2
> +- someotherone...
>      +- commons-logging...
> {quote}
> Cheers

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to