[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=171193#action_171193 ]
Rory Winston commented on MNG-1931: ----------------------------------- It would be nice to be able to add custom taglets to a classpath used just for reporting, for instance > add a reportingManagement section > --------------------------------- > > Key: MNG-1931 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1931 > Project: Maven 2 > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Design, Patterns & Best Practices, POM > Environment: maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-3-SNAPSHOT > Reporter: Indrajit Raychaudhuri > Fix For: 3.x > > > Consider the following POM: > {code:xml} > <!-- ... ... --> > <!-- ... ... --> > <build> > <pluginManagement> > <plugin> > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId> > <configuration> > <author>false</author> > </configuration> > </plugin> > </pluginManagement> > </build> > <!-- ... ... --> > <!-- ... ... --> > <reporting> > <plugins> > <plugin> > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId> > </plugin> > </plugins> > </reporting> > <!-- ... ... --> > {code} > {{mvn site:site}} doesn't honor the javadoc configuration specified in the > {{<pluginManagement/>}} section. > However, {{mvn javadoc:javadoc}} honors them. > This is true not just for javadoc but other plugins like checkstyle as well. > I guess, the {{<reporting/>}} section doesn't use the {{<pluginManagement/>}} > section at all. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira