[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=168390#action_168390 ]
Dimitri Alexeev commented on SUREFIRE-482: ------------------------------------------ I would also vote for reopening this bug. The idea of JUnit4 was to simplify testing by doing away with unnecessary naming conventions. The decision to test or not to test should _only_ depend on @Test annotation. The temporary deactivated tests should be recognized on that double signature @Ignore("not today") @Test(timeout = 100) public void computationPerformance() { ... } > Surefire tries to run JUnit4 tests that contain no @Test annotations > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SUREFIRE-482 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-482 > Project: Maven Surefire > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Junit 4.x support > Affects Versions: 2.4.2 > Reporter: Mark Hobson > Attachments: test.zip > > > Similar to SUREFIRE-346 but for JUnit4, Surefire tries to run classes that > contain no @Test annotations as tests, resulting in the exception: > java.lang.Exception: No runnable methods > at > org.junit.internal.runners.MethodValidator.validateInstanceMethods(MethodValidator.java:32) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.MethodValidator.validateMethodsForDefaultRunner(MethodValidator.java:43) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.validate(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:36) > at > org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.<init>(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:27) > at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native > Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27) > at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:494) > at > org.junit.internal.requests.ClassRequest.buildRunner(ClassRequest.java:33) > at > org.junit.internal.requests.ClassRequest.getRunner(ClassRequest.java:28) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.<init>(JUnit4TestSet.java:45) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4DirectoryTestSuite.createTestSet(JUnit4DirectoryTestSuite.java:56) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.locateTestSets(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:96) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.createSuiteFromDefinition(Surefire.java:209) > at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:156) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:338) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:997) > Such classes should be ignored by Surefire. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira