[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=154831#action_154831
]
Gabriele Garuglieri commented on SUREFIRE-482:
----------------------------------------------
Excuse me i don't understand why you fixed this same problem for Junit 3
(SUREFIRE-346) and you refuse to solve it for Junit 4.
Why you should put a restriction on class names when Junit does not?
As Mark pointed out, don't you think that behavior consistency, given that this
request doesn't violate any rule, should be more important than anything else?
Thanks, Gabriele
> Surefire tries to run JUnit4 tests that contain no @Test annotations
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SUREFIRE-482
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-482
> Project: Maven Surefire
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Junit 4.x support
> Affects Versions: 2.4.2
> Reporter: Mark Hobson
> Attachments: test.zip
>
>
> Similar to SUREFIRE-346 but for JUnit4, Surefire tries to run classes that
> contain no @Test annotations as tests, resulting in the exception:
> java.lang.Exception: No runnable methods
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodValidator.validateInstanceMethods(MethodValidator.java:32)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodValidator.validateMethodsForDefaultRunner(MethodValidator.java:43)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.validate(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:36)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.<init>(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:27)
> at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
> Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
> at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:494)
> at
> org.junit.internal.requests.ClassRequest.buildRunner(ClassRequest.java:33)
> at
> org.junit.internal.requests.ClassRequest.getRunner(ClassRequest.java:28)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.<init>(JUnit4TestSet.java:45)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4DirectoryTestSuite.createTestSet(JUnit4DirectoryTestSuite.java:56)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.locateTestSets(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:96)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.createSuiteFromDefinition(Surefire.java:209)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:156)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:338)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:997)
> Such classes should be ignored by Surefire.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
