[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_127843
 ] 

Apaar Trivedi commented on MECLIPSE-405:
----------------------------------------

When is Maven 2.0.9 being released?  Are you saying in maven 2.0.9+ this range 
issue will include 3.3.0.x in [3.3.0-3.4.0)?  That is a relief.  

Another issue I would like to mention is that you suggested on the mailing list 
to use make-artifacts and I would like to note that the artifact id's it 
provides are incorrect, which is the reason for its deprecation.  For instance, 
make-artifacts will make an artifact with 
groupId: org.eclipse.core 
and then call its artifact id org.eclipse.core.boot,
when it should just be 'boot'.

This is the reason why we have not used make-artifacts to solve this problem.  
Additionally, would it hurt to provide the stripQualifier as a parameter so 
that people who are not using the eclipse nightly builds can still take 
advantage of eclipse:to-maven while still using maven 2.0.8-?



> to-maven target should allow to strip qualifier when creating artifacts from 
> osgi bundles
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MECLIPSE-405
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-405
>             Project: Maven 2.x Eclipse Plugin
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>         Environment: Windows xp, regarding maven-eclipse-plugin, java 1.5
>            Reporter: Apaar Trivedi
>         Attachments: to-mavenStringQualifier.patch
>
>
> There is a problem with to-maven target which forces the user to append the 
> OSGI qualifiers to the artifact versions, thus making it impossible for 
> dependencies to resolve one another, due to the fact that the range specified 
> is not met with a version with a qualifier.  
> For instance, after mvn eclipse:to-maven is run, the eclipse plugins are 
> added into the repository.  Many of them depend on each other, and their 
> dependency is based on a range, for instance 3.3.0-3.4.0, but the dependency 
> provided ends up getting the version 3.3.0.-I20070403, i.e it has some 
> qualifier and so it does not match up, and therefore the dependencies do not 
> resolve and it all does not work.
> The solution involves allowing the 'stripQualifier' parameter to be exposed 
> in the plugin, here is a note I sent to the dev list:
> We need one thing parameterized on the EclipseToMavenMojo.java in the 
> maven-eclipse-plugin which should be parameterized anyway.  In the call to 
> osgiVersionToMavenVersion, it only allows 'false' to be passed in for the 
> 'strip qualifier' parameter.
> While the make-artifacts (which extends to-maven) target allows you to strip 
> the qualifier, this is not a parameter that can be used in the to-maven 
> target.  This is a problem because using 'to-maven' provides artifacts with 
> the proper names and hierarchy, but the dependecies do not resolve due to the 
> qualifiers on the versions.  While make-artifacts provides dependecies that 
> resolve but the naming convention of the groupId's and artifactId's is 
> incorrect, so this is also unacceptable, not to mention make-artifacts is 
> deprecated for this reason.
>  
> Just a parameter -DstripQualifer that gets passed in to the call to 
>       osgiVersionToMavenVersion( String version, String forcedQualifier, 
> boolean stripQualifier ) would be perfect. 
> I have included a patch which provides this parameter and uses it in the 
> necessary call to the method, while leaving its default value as false, thus 
> no functionality would change unless the parameter is used.  Please consider 
> this asap, as it is stopping some work of ours here and I have had to modify 
> the source and install a fixed copy to my local repo to currently get around 
> this.
> Thank you

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to