[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_123967
 ] 

Vincent Siveton commented on MJAVADOC-176:
------------------------------------------

Related thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Javadoc-plugin-bug-issue-reprised-td15400050s177.html

> javadoc uses the undcoumented and platform unspecific -J-fullversion to 
> determine version instead of the more standardized -J-version
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MJAVADOC-176
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-176
>             Project: Maven 2.x Javadoc Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.3
>         Environment: All Platforms
>            Reporter: Alexander Sack
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: MNG-176-maven-javadoc-plugin.patch
>
>
> The -J-fullversion is not as standardized as the -Jversion across multiple 
> platforms.  On SCO UnixWare 7.1.4, the -J-fullversion returns the equivalent 
> of the System's java.vm.version which has a non-standard string compared to 
> the normal -J-version (the output you expect to be java version is 
> "x.y.z_rev" etc.  Its wiser going forward to use just -J-version to determine 
> the javadoc version number.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to