[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_118702
]
Vincent Siveton commented on MNG-3313:
--------------------------------------
Did you check these plugins in the mojo land?
http://mojo.codehaus.org/nbm-maven-plugin/
http://mojo.codehaus.org/netbeans-freeform-maven-plugin/
> NetBeans projects, more than ant project, more than free form project.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3313
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3313
> Project: Maven 2
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Dependencies, Design, Patterns & Best Practices, IDEs,
> POM
> Reporter: Imre Tabur
> Priority: Critical
>
> Is better to have maven (plugin) that generates correct NetBeans project, not
> only ANT free form project:
> 1)Including information about what type project it is - ear, war, jar
> 2)Correct Source/Binary format by POM - right now it desn't generate correct
> source level!
> 3)Recursively resolved dependencies packages for project for compile, build,
> test
> 4)maven source tree
> layout(http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html)
> must accept also other source layouts like default NetBeans layout or any
> other what users/developers do . Maven can't be dominant at this point,
> because people cant always remake theirs projects by maven needs. If we
> compare rpm/yum, deb/apt systems with maven, then maven tries to be dominant
> - all things must be done this way how maven accept it, but deb/rpm
> conception says: "We accept developers(users) packages and we can build users
> sources, we don't need special layout for that!".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
