jira-importer opened a new issue, #584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/issues/584

   **[Tamas 
Cservenak](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=cstamas)**
 opened 
**[MINDEXER-167](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINDEXER-167?redirect=false)**
 and commented
   
   Shading is getting more and more problematic, and it is actually "indexer 
consumer" who can/should decide what to shade. The indexer-core shading shaded 
only Lucene in (and caused issues like MINDEXER-107), while it left SLF4J and 
many other "potential clashing" dependencines unshaded. As there is no "one 
size fit all" for shading, best is to remove shaded artifact alltogether, and 
let consumers shade as best suits them, if they want to.
   
   
   ---
   
   **Remote Links:**
   - [Fix commit
   
](https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/commit/74856ae7bd4fd9b4a0dbbc4386fd93e3d58c15f0)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to