[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCM-230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17960550#comment-17960550
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on SCM-230:
------------------------------------

jira-importer commented on issue #425:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/issues/425#issuecomment-2964593734

   **[Ryan 
Daum](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rdaum)** 
commented
   
   I will give SCM-244 a few days to gel, and see if anybody looks like they'll 
move on it.  If not, I may do as you say.
   
   I am new to the Maven community, and do not know how I would go about 
getting the Mercurial plugin included in the Maven 2 distribution, and also if 
it's permissible to just get SVN access and fix the ChangeLongCommandTckTest 
base class myself.  Any ideas?  The company I work for is making use of 
Mercurial, as well as Maven, and I want to be able to use Continuum and other 
features of Maven that rely on SCM support.
   




> mercurial plugin
> ----------------
>
>                 Key: SCM-230
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCM-230
>             Project: Maven SCM (Moved to GitHub Issues)
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: maven-scm-provider-mercurial (hg)
>            Reporter: solo turn
>            Assignee: Emmanuel Venisse
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.0-rc1
>
>         Attachments: maven-scm-hg.tar.gz, maven-scm-provider-hg-0.09.tbz, 
> maven-scm-provider-hg-0.8.tbz, maven-scm-provider-hg-0.8.tbz, 
> maven-scm-provider-hg-0.8.tbz, maven-scm-provider-hg-1.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz, 
> maven-scm-provider-hg.diff.gz, maven-scm-provider-hg.tar.gz, 
> maven-scm-provider-hg.tgz, scm-230-patch-1.svndiff, site-patch, site-patch-2
>
>
> it would be nice to have a mercurial source provider. and if not, it would be 
> nice to update the documentation on http://maven.apache.org/scm/ so that 
> anybody could just copy the bzr provider and make a mercurial provider out of 
> it. it should be nearly the same implementation.
> mercurial is (currently) much faster than bzr and therefor really useable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to