[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17958046#comment-17958046
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MJAVADOC-668:
---------------------------------------
This project has moved from Jira to GitHub Issues. This issue was migrated to
[apache/maven-javadoc-plugin#1047|https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/issues/1047].
> Improve <jdkToolchain> parameter description
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MJAVADOC-668
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-668
> Project: Maven Javadoc Plugin (Moved to GitHub Issues)
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Marcono1234
> Assignee: Robert Scholte
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
>
> As pointed out in [this
> comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-500?focusedCommentId=16804678&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16804678]
> on MJAVADOC-500 it would be good to improve the {{<jdkToolchain>}} parameter
> documentation.
> The [current
> documentation|https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/javadoc-mojo.html#jdkToolchain]
> only mentions that it represents "requirements for this jdk toolchain", but
> it is not exactly clear what the syntax for these requirements is, or to what
> they apply.
> It might be good to use Surefire's
> [documentation|https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html#jdkToolchain]
> as reference, which hints that the {{<jdkToolchain>}} specifies the
> requirements for the {{<provides>}} values of the JDK toolchains.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
