[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17937406#comment-17937406
 ] 

Gili edited comment on MCOMPILER-412 at 3/21/25 12:55 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------

Either the parameter name change or there is a typo in the title and 
description. I think you meant to refer to {{\--processor-module-path}} not 
{{\--process-module-path}}.


was (Author: cowwoc):
Either the parameter name change or there is a typo in the title and 
description. I think you meant to refer to *--processor-module-path* not 
{*}--process-module-path{*}.

> Support --process-module-path
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: MCOMPILER-412
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-412
>             Project: Maven Compiler Plugin (Moved to GitHub)
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.8.0, 3.8.1
>            Reporter: remi forax
>            Priority: Major
>
> {quote}
> In the modular world, javac will look for annotation processor in the 
> module-path (only if the annotation processor module is required by the 
> module-info, you can use "required static" or uses with the service) and 
> javac will also look to the --processor-module-path with again a nice 
> separation because the source code doesn't see the module inside the module.
> Everything works cleanly if there is no module-info.java, if you have a 
> module-info.java, you have two cases
>  1) your annotation processor is itself a module, if you do a requires on it, 
> Maven will put it in the module-path, so it will work (but there is no nice 
> separation provided by --processor-module-path)
>  2) your annotation processor is not a module, you can do a require on it but 
> Maven will not put it on the module-path because it's not a module, so you 
> have to use the <processor-path> of the Maven compiler plugin
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to