[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17905025#comment-17905025
 ] 

Guillaume Nodet commented on MNG-5626:
--------------------------------------

It will be fixed as part of MNG-5729

> Avoid negative durations or handle them correctly
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-5626
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5626
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Logging
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.1
>            Reporter: Christian Jung
>            Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.1.0
>
>
> In issue MNG-5623 we reported an exception when printing the reactor summary 
> if one of the times was negative.
> I saw in one case, that the overall maven build time, as measured from 
> outside (i.e. by our QuickBuild system) was -10.8 seconds. The corresponding 
> reactor summary was:
> {code}
> 13:55:25,184 INFO  - Reactor Summary:
> 13:55:25,184 INFO  -
> 13:55:25,184 INFO  - module1 ........................................... 
> SUCCESS [ 5.911 s]
> 13:55:25,184 INFO  - module2 ........................................... 
> SUCCESS [ 0.255 s]
> 13:55:25,184 INFO  - gpPlaygroundBase-lnx-x64-gcc4 ..................... 
> SUCCESS [-27.-64 s]
> 13:55:25,185 INFO  - 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 13:55:25,185 INFO  - BUILD SUCCESS
> 13:55:25,185 INFO  - 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 13:55:25,185 INFO  - Total time: -20.-73 s
> 13:55:25,185 INFO  - Finished at: 2014-04-28T13:55:25+01:00
> 13:55:25,572 INFO  - Final Memory: 32M/439M
> 13:55:25,572 INFO  - 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> {code}
> The thing is quite hard to reproduce, the machines were virtual machines that 
> have been running for quite a long time.
> Our administrators suspected that just at this point, the local clock was 
> synchronized with some outer source.
> We should check if such negative durations can be avoided, and if not, they 
> should be handled correctly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to