[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17904255#comment-17904255
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MSHARED-1454:
-----------------------------------------

LogFlames commented on PR #50:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/maven-dependency-tree/pull/50#issuecomment-2529114858

   Would this be a feasible change to enable verbose logging output in 
maven-dependency-plugin? If it is preferable I could create a PR to 
maven-dependency-plugin that is dependent on this one to have all code-changes 
in context.
   
   @elharo wdyt?




> Conflict Data on VerboseDependencyNode is hidden
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MSHARED-1454
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1454
>             Project: Maven Shared Components
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: maven-dependency-tree
>            Reporter: Elias Lundell
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In maven-dependency-plugin there are multiple export formats for the 
> dependency tree, these include Json, DOT, GraphML etc. When creating the 
> normal tree all information is there to format it nicely as e.g. Json. 
> However, when running `{{{}mvn dependency:tree -Dverbose{}}}`, all nodes are 
> included (as they are VerboseDependencyNode) but since VerboseDependencyNode 
> is internal in maven-dependency-tree there is no (clean) way to include 
> information of which nodes are included or not (see 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MDEP-962).
> The only current way to include this information would be to parse the 
> `{{{}toNodeString(){}}}` output (where excluded nodes are wrapped in 
> parenthesis).
> I propose to expose ConflictData on the DependencyNode and make it null for 
> DefaultDependencyNode to allow for more detailed information in the 
> machine-readable formats.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to