[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17790998#comment-17790998 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MSHARED-1285: ----------------------------------------- lalmeras commented on PR #77: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-filtering/pull/77#issuecomment-1831557819 Already done it (copy/fix TestIncrementalBuildContext). It doesn't work out of the box as there is other tests that rely on this bug to work. And another bug in getRelpath. But I agree the best option is to retrieve/fix/adapt TestIncrementalBuildContext so that the 4 tests that use it work and actually test the effective filtering behavior. Just not as simple as it seems. I plan to work on it. I'll keep this issue updated about my work on it. Once the tests fixed, I think it'll be easier to write a test exposing the current issue. > DefaultMavenResourcesFiltering uses BuildContext in a way that fails sometimes > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: MSHARED-1285 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1285 > Project: Maven Shared Components > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Christoph Läubrich > Priority: Major > > The maven resources plugin uses > [https://github.com/apache/maven-filtering/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/shared/filtering/DefaultMavenResourcesFiltering.java] > to copy resources, but that component has some subtile flaws reported here: > [https://github.com/eclipse-m2e/m2e-core/discussions/1468] > The problematic part is the usage of BuildContext#newScanner that already > mentions in the javadoc that passing ignoreDelta to neScanner might not > reveal all required items +*for copy-resources*+ form A -> B and instead > BuildContext#isUpTodate should be used. > Just from a quick look I assume that part of code actually wants to use > something like this: > {code:java} > DirectoryScanner ds = new DirectoryScanner() { > @Override > protected boolean isSelected(String name, File file) { > if (file.isFile() && buildContext.isUptodate(getTargetFile(file), file)) > { > return false; > } > return true; > } > }; > ds.setBasedir(basedir); {code} > That way all the code that currently checks for if output directory existed > before can also be removed what is another issue because it leads to a full > resources copy even if source+target are already even if a single class file > is changed while the idea seems more that if the output was not there it > should not try to be incremental! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)