[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17790998#comment-17790998
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MSHARED-1285:
-----------------------------------------

lalmeras commented on PR #77:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-filtering/pull/77#issuecomment-1831557819

   Already done it (copy/fix TestIncrementalBuildContext). It doesn't work out 
of the box as there is other tests that rely on this bug to work. And another 
bug in getRelpath.
   
   But I agree the best option is to retrieve/fix/adapt 
TestIncrementalBuildContext so that the 4 tests that use it work and actually 
test the effective filtering behavior. Just not as simple as it seems.
   
   I plan to work on it. I'll keep this issue updated about my work on it.
   
   Once the tests fixed, I think it'll be easier to write a test exposing the 
current issue.




> DefaultMavenResourcesFiltering uses BuildContext in a way that fails sometimes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MSHARED-1285
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1285
>             Project: Maven Shared Components
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Christoph Läubrich
>            Priority: Major
>
> The maven resources plugin uses 
> [https://github.com/apache/maven-filtering/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/shared/filtering/DefaultMavenResourcesFiltering.java]
>  to copy resources, but that component has some subtile flaws reported here:
> [https://github.com/eclipse-m2e/m2e-core/discussions/1468]
> The problematic part is the usage of BuildContext#newScanner that already 
> mentions in the javadoc that passing ignoreDelta to neScanner might not 
> reveal all required items +*for copy-resources*+ form A -> B and instead 
> BuildContext#isUpTodate should be used.
> Just from a quick look I assume that part of code actually wants to use 
> something like this:
> {code:java}
> DirectoryScanner ds = new DirectoryScanner() {
>   @Override
>   protected boolean isSelected(String name, File file) {
>     if (file.isFile() && buildContext.isUptodate(getTargetFile(file), file)) 
> { 
>      return false;
>     }
>     return true;
>   }
> };
> ds.setBasedir(basedir); {code}
> That way all the code that currently checks for if output directory existed 
> before can also be removed what is another issue because it leads to a full 
> resources copy even if source+target are already even if a single class file 
> is changed while the idea seems more that if the output was not there it 
> should not try to be incremental!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to