[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17699224#comment-17699224
 ] 

Elliotte Rusty Harold commented on MNG-7655:
--------------------------------------------

I'm OK with keeping the artifact ID org.apache.maven:plexus-utils

I am not OK with keeping the package names the same. The current work seems 
likely to cause major problems with split packages in JDK 9+ and classpath 
conflicts and dimaond dependency problems in all JDKs. 

https://jlbp.dev/JLBP-6

> rename Maven core's plexus-utils to more explicit artifactId
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-7655
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7655
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-2
>            Reporter: Herve Boutemy
>            Priority: Major
>
> in https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/829 , Maven's internal plexus-utils 
> repackaging is used, switching from Plexus original 
> {{org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils}} to {{org.apache.maven:plexus-utils}}
> this switch keeping the exact same artifactId but just changing only the 
> groupId is confusing: we need another artifactId
> {{maven-plexus-utils}}?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to