psiroky commented on code in PR #180:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/maven-compiler-plugin/pull/180#discussion_r1121557872
##########
src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/compiler/AbstractCompilerMojo.java:
##########
@@ -330,6 +335,22 @@ public abstract class AbstractCompilerMojo extends
AbstractMojo {
@Parameter
private List<DependencyCoordinate> annotationProcessorPaths;
+ /**
+ * <p>
+ * Whether to use the Maven dependency management section when resolving
transitive dependencies of annotation
+ * processor paths.
+ * </p>
+ * <p>
+ * This flag does not enable / disable the ability to get the version of
annotation processor paths
+ * (the top-level paths) from dependency management section. It only
influences the resolution of
+ * transitive dependencies of those top-level paths.
+ * </p>
+ *
+ * @since 3.12.0
+ */
+ @Parameter(defaultValue = "false")
+ private boolean annotationProcessorPathsUseDepMgmt;
Review Comment:
I am not the biggest fan of this long name, but I could not find a better
one at this point. Reason I choose this one is that the prefix
`annotationProcessorPaths` means it will be rendered/shown together with the
paths option, meaning users are much more likely to see this when browsing the
docs (and making the connection that is used for annotation processor paths).
We could use something like `useDepMgmt` or so, but then you need to know
exactly what you are looking for, since this would be rendered very far away
from the `annotationProcessorPaths`. Also something like `useDepMgmt` may be
too generic?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
