[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17642951#comment-17642951
]
Alexander Kriegisch edited comment on MSHADE-124 at 12/4/22 8:05 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[~gzm55], I am sorry if I am asking a naive question, but why would anyone use
Shade and Assembly in the same module? In all situations I ever encountered, I
would use either A or B, but not both. Is there an actual use case?
Having said that, of course it is still great that you created a patch which
covers even this corner case. 🙂
was (Author: kriegaex):
[~gzm55], I am sorry if I am asking a naive question, but why would anyone use
Shade and Assembly in the same module? In all situations I ever encountered, I
would use either A or B, but not both. Is there an actual use case?
> Need better plan for getting dependency-reduced-pom.xml out of basedir
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MSHADE-124
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-124
> Project: Maven Shade Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.7.1
> Reporter: Benson Margulies
> Priority: Major
>
> MSHADE-123 reported that putting the d-r-p into some location other
> than 'basedir' causes 'basedir' to follow it around, which can break builds.
> This is hard to fix, given the core maven definition of basedir as 'the dir
> containing the pom' with no option to change it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
