[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17573168#comment-17573168
 ] 

Hudson commented on MENFORCER-424:
----------------------------------

Build succeeded in Jenkins: Maven » Maven TLP » maven-enforcer » master #61

See 
https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-enforcer/job/master/61/

> Maven enforcer rule which checks that all dependencies in 
> dependencyManagement don't have an explicit scope set
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MENFORCER-424
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-424
>             Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Standard Rules
>            Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>            Assignee: Slawomir Jaranowski
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: next-release
>
>
> Setting the scope in the dependencyManagement is an anti-pattern and may lead 
> to surprising results during classpath creation. Compare also with the 
> discussion in 
> https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/pull/63#discussion_r788361219.
> I propose to add a new rule with name {{banDependencyManagementScope}}.
> Probably scope {{import}} should be accepted though, because it is a special 
> case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to