[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17573160#comment-17573160
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MNG-7520:
-------------------------------------
michael-o commented on PR #776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/776#issuecomment-1199913106
> Am unsure about the "worthiness" of this PR.... I mean, will someone
really want to use Hazelcast AND Redisson? IMHO, this is -0 as am pretty sure
people will "stick" to one or another, and also, there is file locking...
It is not about having BOTH in place. It shalls imply reduce manual setup
and simplification of our documentation. Both are contained to handle both
cases, NOT at the same time.
> Simplify integration of Redisson and Hazelcast for Maven Resolver
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-7520
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7520
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Artifacts and Repositories, Dependencies
> Reporter: Michael Osipov
> Assignee: Michael Osipov
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.9.0, 4.0.0-alpha-1, 4.0.0
>
>
> Currently, to integrate Redisson or Hazelcast into Maven for distributed
> locking you need to create directories and modify {{m2.conf}}. We can make
> life easier by pre-creating them in the distribution.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
