[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17532657#comment-17532657 ]
Slawomir Jaranowski commented on MENFORCER-356: ----------------------------------------------- It is not good way to add meta-data or even worst depends plugin code on external api. If we go in this way we open possibility to adding meta-data for external tools .... So question - in next request we should add more meta-data for other IDE, tool ... etc? It should be resolved by m2e in some how, without changing plugins. > Please support m2e lifecycle management > --------------------------------------- > > Key: MENFORCER-356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-356 > Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Luke Hutchison > Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.0.1 > > > The maven-enforcer-plugin does not work with m2e without configuration using > the `lifecyleManagement` tag. However, that tag causes numerous bad > interactions between m2e and commandline mvn. > Recently m2e added a new configuration mechanism for specifying the lifecycle > management configuration: > [https://www.eclipse.org/m2e/documentation/release-notes-17.html#new-syntax-for-specifying-lifecycle-mapping-metadata] > The directive that works for me to get maven-enforcer-plugin to work with m2e > is: > <?m2e execute onConfiguration,onIncremental?> > However, this style of directive, <?...?>, breaks numerous tools, including > Sonatype's artifact publishing framework, and the Scrutinizer CI / static > code analyzer, because they use custom XML parsers that can't yet handle this > syntax. That means I have to leave the directive in the pom.xml while > developing, so that I can use Eclipse, and then I have to remove it before > publishing or analyzing any built jar. > It would be very helpful if maven-enforcer-plugin could make use of the m2e > lifecycle management API internally to configure itself to work with m2e, so > that this directive is not needed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)