gnodet commented on a change in pull request #668:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/668#discussion_r795705038



##########
File path: maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultMaven.java
##########
@@ -232,6 +232,13 @@ private MavenExecutionResult doExecute( 
MavenExecutionRequest request, MavenSess
             return addExceptionToResult( result, e );
         }
 
+        for ( WorkspaceReader workspaceReader : getProjectScopedExtensions( 
session.getProjects(),
+                                                                            
WorkspaceReader.class ) )
+        {
+            repoSession.setWorkspaceReader( 
ChainedWorkspaceReader.newInstance( repoSession.getWorkspaceReader(),
+                                                                               
 workspaceReader ) );
+        }
+
         WorkspaceReader reactorWorkspace;

Review comment:
       The `ChainedWorkspaceReader` has a constructor taking an array of 
WorkspaceReader.  I think it would make sense to use it instead of chaining 
them one by one.
   Btw, I think this also applies to the original call a few lines below:
   ```
           repoSession.setWorkspaceReader( ChainedWorkspaceReader.newInstance( 
reactorWorkspace,
                                                                               
repoSession.getWorkspaceReader() ) );
   ```




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to