[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17262742#comment-17262742
 ] 

Rick Moritz commented on MNG-5761:
----------------------------------

I assume this was dropped so far, as it will potentially break working builds, 
and therefore was unsuitable for dot-releases.
Now that it has been re-scheduled for 4.0, is there reason to be hopeful, that 
this feature will be included there?
Given that good progress is being made on 4.0.0-alpha, yet there's no assignee 
for this (previously fixed?) issue, I'm somewhat worried, that it could end up 
on the cutting floor once more - and then likely for another 5-10 years, as the 
"not a major release" argument will the be just as valid as before.

> Dependency management is not transitive.
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-5761
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5761
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Dependencies
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.5
>            Reporter: Jeff Schnitzer
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 4.0.x-candidate
>
>         Attachments: MNG-5761.zip
>
>
> A detailed description of the issue is here:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28312975/maven-dependencymanagement-version-ignored-in-transitive-dependencies
> The short of it is that maven appears to be using the wrong 
> <dependencyManagement> version in a transitive dependency.  There are two 
> relevant <dependencyManagement> sections in the build, one pulled in by guice 
> and one pulled in by gwizard-parent. These are the dependency paths from the 
> top:
> gwizard-example -> gwizard-config -> gwizard-parent
> gwizard-example -> gwizard-config -> guice -> guice-parent
> gwizard-parent's dependencyManagement specifies guava 18
> guice-parent's dependencyManagement specifies guava 16
> Guava 16 is winning. This seems highly undesirable, and in fact it breaks our 
> build. I would expect that in a version # fight, "closest to the top" should 
> win.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to