[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2704?page=comments#action_84667 ] 
            
Stephan Zehrer commented on MNG-2704:
-------------------------------------

again and again and again ...
and I did not change something in my configuration (hopefully *g*)

10.01.07 18:15:30 CET: Reading /vse/pom.xml
10.01.07 18:15:30 CET: Local repository folder "" does not exist
10.01.07 18:15:30 CET: No versions are present in the repository for the 
artifact with a range [3.2.0,4.0.0) 
org.eclipse.equinox:org.eclipse.equinox.common-null.jar

I read an an article about cleanups in the rep. ... is this maybe a reason??

 

> Range check don't work correct
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-2704
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2704
>             Project: Maven 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Dependencies
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.4
>         Environment: OS: Windows XP
> Java: jdk1.5.0_10
>            Reporter: Stephan Zehrer
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: demo.zip
>
>
> I included the following part in my pom.xml:
>               <dependency>
>                       <groupId>org.eclipse.jface</groupId>
>                       <artifactId>org.eclipse.jface</artifactId>
>                       <version>3.2.0</version>
>               </dependency>   
> I always get the following error 
> No versions are present in the repository for the artifact with a range 
> [3.2.0,4.0.0)
>   org.eclipse.equinox:org.eclipse.equinox.common:jar:null
> But I am sure that version 3.2.0 is available in the repository. 
> If I define only a dependency on this library like this
>               <dependency>
>                       <groupId>org.eclipse.equinox</groupId>
>                       <artifactId>org.eclipse.equinox.common</artifactId>
>                       <version>3.2.0</version>
>               </dependency>
> it works!
> If I define both it will not work. Why?
> According 
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Dependency+Mediation+and+Conflict+Resolution
> It could be forced by this
> My current workaround is the exclusion definition.
> What did I wrong or is this a bug?
> See the demo I Attached, you need the Eclipse repository.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to