[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Marwell updated MCHECKSTYLE-264:
-----------------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: I forgot the Licence header in a new file and the check already failed. I
think this can be closed now.)
> Should checkstyle check the license of a file
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MCHECKSTYLE-264
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-264
> Project: Maven Checkstyle Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Karl Heinz Marbaise
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently i have issues related to that checkstyle checks the license of a
> file and apache-rat-plugin will do as well. This is from my point of view
> duplicated....The question which of the plugins should be responsible for
> licenses. I would vote for apache-rat-plugin?
> In the example in JXR i have to make a configuration for apache-rat-plugin
> and for checkstyle plugin.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
